The conference’s business relation committee plans to seek authorization from the owners to modify the new scheme by which pass intervention is reviewable by instantaneous replay, and potentially make all such reviews come on coaches’ challenges.
The NFL continues to deal with the wake of the umpirage error that cost the Saints a Super Bowl berth.(Gerald Herbert, File)
KEY BISCAYNE, Fla. — It has been less than two months since NFL owners voted to make pass intervention reviewable by instantaneous replay, a alteration that came in the wake of the prodigious umpirage blooper in last season’s NFC statute title game.
And alat the ready, the conference is at the ready to pinch the new measure, months earlier the adapted replay scheme is put to its archetypal on-field test.
Owners of the 32 NFL teams began to gathering Tuesday at a Key Biscayne resort hotel for a one-day group meeting scheduled for Wednesday. The business relation committee plans to seek the owners’ approval Wednesday of a resolution that would authorize it to modify the replay-for-intervention rule. With the alteration, all pass intervention calls would fall under the coaches’ challenge scheme.
[NFL and players’ union to study potential use of marijuana for pain management]
The scheme ratified by owners in March at the annual conference group meeting in Phoenix puts such reviews of intervention rulings under the challenge scheme for all but the final two minutes of each half. Initiating a replay review of a pass intervention call must be done by the replay booth in those final two minutes.
In March, the thinking was that coaches should not be able to challenge pass intervention calls or non-calls in the final two minutes because that would enable them to challenge a non-call on a Hail Mary pass, with its jumble of players jostling for end zone positioning for what amounts to a jump ball.
But since then, the concern has become the number of stoppages that could occur from booth-initiated replay reviews of pass intervention.
“We’ve clearly made a step in the right direction,” Atlanta Falcons President Rich McKay, chairman of the business relation committee, said Tuesday. “I would say that the issue here is that as you go through it, one thing you do not want to do is be a game that has multiple stops in the last two minutes.”
The concerns were voiced by teams to Al Riveron, the NFL’s senior vice president of umpirage.
“I think we were all comfortable when we left Phoenix on the procedures,” McKay said. "And one of the concerns about leaving it in the coaches’ challenge [scheme] was the Hail Mary, the last play, that idea of: How do we not have a challenge on every one of those? So that’s when it really reverted to, ‘Let’s go to the replay assistant.’ I think as Al has gone around, I think the concern is: How many stoppages will we end up with in the last two minutes?”
The coaches’ challenge scheme limits the number of replay reviews — and stoppages to the game — because each coach has only two challenges per game, then is granted a third if both of those challenges are successful.
[NFL to reconsider overtime pinchs, but alterations regarded as unlikely]
"The one nice thing about the challenge scheme is, it has a substantiality meter to it,” McKay said. “And that meter is based on the coach. It’s based on his thought that, ‘This is a very important play.’ Whereas in the replay assistant … there is no materiality factor. It’s just: If there’s something that looks like it’s reviewable, they’re supposed to stop the game regardless of whether it’s important or not important.”
No alteration will be made Wednesday. The business relation committee wants the authority from the owners to make the alteration earlier the season if it comes to believe, after further study, that is what should be done.
“I think we’re trying to figure out how to deal with the Hail Marys because no, we don’t want those challenged,” New York Giants co-owner John Mara, a member of the business relation committee, said Tuesday.
McKay said the business relation committee likely would exclude Hail Mary plays from being challenged by coaches for pass intervention.
“If we go down this path and it ends up being a challenge scheme, you’ll exclude and exempt that play in some way,” he said. “You’ve got to write it. You’ve got to figure it out and make sure everybody agrees to it. But then it would just become a play that’s not reviewable. It doesn’t mean pass intervention can’t be called. … But it does mean it wouldn’t be in the replay scheme.”
That, too, would present its complications: how to define, in a rule, what’s a Hail Mary and what isn’t.
“I actually don’t think it’s that hard,” McKay said. “It’s gonna be: From what yard line was it thrown? Were there multiple receivers? How much time’s left on the clock? There’s a few elements that we all know go into the Hail Mary. But you want to get the input from the coaches. … You don’t want to take away a real play. If they’re at the 15-yard line and they’re running what is a real diagrammed play, you wouldn’t then want to say that play is not subject to review. We’ll have plenty of discussion. I don’t think it’s that hard to define.”
The NFL, by making intervention reviewable, is attempting to avoid of repeat of the umpirage gaffe that sent the Los Angeles Rams to the Super Bowl rather than the New Orleans Saints. But things rarely are simple and straightforward when it comes to NFL rule-making, and now the accompanying task is to avoid the sort of confusion that surrounded the new helmet-hitting rule and roughing-the-passer calls last season.
“I think whenever you have a new rule like this, there’s always some concern about how it’s gonna be implemented,” Mara said. “I think we’ll be fine.”
Owners also are to give consideration Wednesday to the proposal by the Kansas City Chiefs, tabled in March, to guarantee each team at least one possession in overtime. The Chiefs made the proposal after losing the AFC championship game on a touchdown by the New England Patriots on the opening possession of overtime.
The Chiefs’ proposal appears unlikely to generate the 24 votes among the 32 franchises necessary for ratification, owners and other high-ranking team officials said.
“I think there’s some support,” said Green Bay Packers President Mark Murphy, a member of the business relation committee. “But I don’t think there’s enough for it to get voted in.”
Reuben Foster’s torn ACL is confirmed; LB will miss entire Redskins season
James Holzhauer wins again on ‘Jeopardy!’, denying us a Tom Brady-strawberry showdown
Colin Kaepernick helped the Warriors celebrate their sweep of Trail Blazers